The Man & The Law is a compilation of Fame Agidife Legal Thoughts – spanning from his legal written works on The Wisdom Of The Temple Of Justice, The Principle Of Natural Justice & Rule Of Law, Principle Of Indemnity In Law and Constitutional Debates On Nationhood and Etc
"The Man & The Law"
"For Man not to be overly arbitrary with liberty and power he must be a subject of the law he creates upon creation." ~ Fame Agidife_TheLegalLens – "The Man & The Law"
“Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.” ~ Lord Acton“ and
in variance; "all power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
“The Man and The Law”
In principle of law, this term can be understood as the relationship between the individual (the man) and the legal system (the law). It explores how human beings are both subject to the law and also the creators/interpreters of the law.
But before then let's stretch the law first as a product of man to protect man and later becomes controller of man in spirit and in letters.
"The Law & The Man" And "The Man & The Law" How They both Operate And Interrelate.
In principles of law, the concepts of "The Law & The Man" and "The Man & The Law" Can be understood as contrasting paradigms in legal and political philosophy, often framed as the "rule of law" versus the "rule of man." These ideas trace back to ancient thinkers and have evolved through history to emphasize the relationship between legal systems and human authority.
This principle prioritizes the supremacy of law over individual whims or arbitrary power, meaning that laws govern society, and all people—including rulers, officials, and citizens—are equally accountable to them. It embodies the idea that law is king, providing stability, predictability, and protection against tyranny. Key elements include:
Equality before the law: No one is above the law, ensuring fairness and preventing favoritism.
Non-arbitrary governance: Laws must be clear, public, prospective (applying to future actions), consistent, and enforceable through independent institutions like courts.
Protection of rights: In substantive interpretations, it also safeguards fundamental human rights and limits governmental discretion.
Historically, this concept originates from ancient civilizations, such as Aristotle's assertion in ancient Greece that "it is more proper that law should govern than any one of the citizens," positioning law as reason free from passion.af9490 In Rome, Cicero echoed this by stating, "We are all servants of the laws in order to be free."9fe52b The phrase "a government of laws and not of men" was popularized in the 17th century by English thinker James Harrington and later adopted by American founders like John Adams in the Massachusetts Constitution (1780) and Thomas Paine, who declared, "In America, the law is king."97fde5 Modern definitions, such as those from the United Nations and legal scholars like A.V. Dicey and Lon Fuller, emphasize that the rule of law prevents the arbitrary use of power and supports democratic governance.d8657e
The Rule of Man ("The Man & The Law")
In contrast, this refers to governance where individuals, rulers, or groups hold ultimate authority, with laws serving as tools of their will rather than binding constraints. Rules can change arbitrarily based on personal desires, leading to inconsistency and potential abuse. It is often associated with:
Arbitrary power: Decisions are driven by the ruler's discretion, without accountability or reason.
Lack of equality: Elites or leaders may be exempt from laws that apply to others.
Risk of tyranny: This can manifest in dictatorships, despotism, or oligarchies where "might makes right."
Plato advocated for rule by an enlightened "philosopher-king" who could rule better than laws, but his student Aristotle critiqued it as prone to passion and corruption.0171a7 In Chinese philosophy, Legalists promoted rule by a strong sovereign, while Confucius favored moral leadership.c4a22c Historical examples include the Thirty Tyrants in ancient Athens, Stalin's Soviet Union, and Hitler's regime, where personal rule led to oppression.2fcbbc Thomas Hobbes supported absolute monarchy as a form of rule by man to avoid anarchy, but critics like former Indian Supreme Court judge Hans Raj Khanna warned that deviations from rule of law are often disguised as rule of man.36f91c
Striking Legal Meaning And Balance
The rule of law ("The Law & The Man") strikes the essential legal balance and provides deeper meaning in principled governance. It tempers human fallibility with structured, impartial rules, fostering justice, liberty, and societal stability while preventing the abuses inherent in rule of man.3f5906 As articulated in sources like the American Bar Association, it ensures "the government of law, not men," creating a framework where laws serve the common good rather than individual caprice.75fcde This balance is not absolute—laws are made and enforced by people—but it minimizes arbitrary power, as seen in foundational documents like the Magna Carta (1215) and the U.S. Constitution.f95137 In essence, while humans create and interpret laws, the rule of law elevates them above personal rule to achieve equitable and meaningful legal order.
"Man As a Creator of The Law and Interpreter To a Subject Of The Law In Fear Of Inherent Absolutism Of Man's Power" ~ Fame Agidife_Thelegallens – "The Man & The Law"
"For Man not to be overly arbitrary with liberty and power he must be a subject of the law he creates upon creation." ~ Fame Agidife_TheLegalLens – "The Man & The Law"
“Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.” ~ Lord Acton“ and
in variance; "all power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
Key Principles And Meanings:
1. The Man as Subject of the Law
Every individual in society is governed by rule of law.
The man must conform to legal norms, otherwise faces sanctions (penalties, imprisonment, fines, etc).
This reflects rule of law: no one is above the law, not even the lawmakers.
2. The Man as Source of the Law
Laws are made by men, for men. Legislators, judges, and jurists (all humans) create, interpret, and apply law.
This reflects the human element of justice: while law is abstract, it must be interpreted with wisdom, fairness, and justice by men.
3. The Man in Tension with the Law
Law restricts absolute freedom; man desires liberty.
This creates a balance: how much law is needed to protect order without destroying freedom?
Here lies the philosophical struggle between liberty and legal control.
4. The Law as Protector of Man
Law protects fundamental rights (life, dignity, property, equality, etc).
It gives structure to justice, ensuring man is not at the mercy of arbitrary power.
5. Jurisprudential Meaning
In jurisprudence, the phrase embodies the dialectics between human nature and legal order:
Without man, there is no law (since man creates it).
Without law, man risks chaos and injustice (since law restrains excesses).
In summary:
“The Man and The Law” means the inevitable interaction between human beings and the legal system — where man is both governed by law and the very architect of law. It reflects the balance between freedom and order, rights and duties, justice and authority.
How “The Man and The Law” Operates in practice across all different areas of legal practicing and In Courts: In Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, and Law Of Natural justice)
⚖️ 1. In Constitutional Law
Here,
“The Man” represents the citizen, and “The Law” represents the constitution.
Example: A citizen (the man) may want absolute freedom of speech, but the law restricts speech that incites violence or hate.
Courts balance this by protecting fundamental rights while ensuring public order.
In Case application: Freedom of expression vs. national security. The man enjoys liberty, but the law draws the boundary.
⚖️ 2. In Criminal Law
“The Man” is both the accused and the victim.
The law governs how crimes are defined, prosecuted, and punished.
Example: If a man steals, his freedom is curtailed by imprisonment. Yet, the same law protects him from unfair trial (right to counsel, presumption of innocence).
In Principle: No man shall be punished except under a law in force at the time of the act (Nullum crimen sine lege).
⚖️ 3. In Natural Justice
“The Man” is entitled to fairness and dignity in legal proceedings.
The law must follow principles like:
Audi alteram partem (hear the other side)
Nemo judex in causa sua (no man should be a judge in his own cause).
Example: Even a guilty man must be given the opportunity to defend himself before punishment.
⚖️ 4. In Civil Law & Contracts
“The Man” is free to enter agreements, but “The Law” enforces obligations and protects against unfairness.
Example: Two men sign a contract; one fails to perform. The law compels fulfillment or awards damages.
In Principle: Pacta sunt servanda (agreements must be kept).
⚖️ 5. In Public Law & Governance
Government (as an embodiment of “the law”) interacts with citizens (the man).
Example: Taxation — the man desires to keep his income, but the law mandates taxes for the welfare of all.
Courts decide if government actions remain within the bounds of legality (judicial review)
Big Picture:
Too much liberty → chaos.
Too much law → oppression.
The principle ensures justice lives in that balance.
Presented ~ By Fame Agidife @Fame Agidife Leadership Lectures
No comments:
Post a Comment